Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 17(24)2020 12 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1362362

ABSTRACT

Informal caregivers are people providing some type of unpaid, ongoing assistance to a person with a chronic illness or disability. Long-term care measures and policies cannot take place without taking into account the quantitatively crucial role played by informal caregivers. We use the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS), and the Study on Health and Ageing in Europe (SHARE) to measure the prevalence of informal caregivers in the European population, and analyze associated socio-demographic factors. This rate ranges between about 13 percent in Portugal and Spain, and more than 22 percent in Luxembourg, Belgium, and Denmark. It declines in older age groups and, on average, is lower in men than in women in all countries studied, and lower among the poorly educated compared to those with higher levels of education. However, large variance was observed in the average share of informal caregivers for most countries between the three surveys. Our findings, estimated through the three surveys, reveal common trends, but also a series of disparities. Additional research will be needed to enable policy makers to access a richer and more harmonized body of data, allowing them to adopt truly evidence-based and targeted policies and interventions in this field.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Caregivers/psychology , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Care/psychology , Prevalence
5.
Nurse Educ ; 46(4): E50-E54, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1331618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals need to recognize trauma exposure and provide trauma-informed care. There is a concomitant need to develop resilience when working in this context. PROBLEM: We recognized the need to educate future health care professionals to provide trauma-informed care, develop resilience skills, and collaborate with other disciplines to provide this care. APPROACH: We used a systematic instructional design process and an interprofessional approach to design and deliver the course. We utilized a range of resources and approached the course from micro, meso, and macro perspectives. OUTCOMES: Through purposeful design, we developed a course that was well-aligned with our objectives. Assessments provided documentation that students achieved the learning outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The course educated future health care professionals on trauma-informed care. Students gained valuable experience that will help them contribute to interprofessional teams in the future. Students also practiced resilience techniques essential for health care professionals.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care , Teaching , Wounds and Injuries , Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Patient Care/methods , Patient Care/psychology , Patient Care Team , Wounds and Injuries/psychology
6.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(4): 450-462, 2021 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1218637

ABSTRACT

Rare diseases frequently attack and weaken the immune system, increasing the patient's vulnerability to develop severe conditions after viral infections, such as COVID-19. Many patients with rare diseases also suffer from mental retardation and disability. These rare disease phenotypes do not emerge in older people who are susceptible to COVID-19 infection, but present at a very young age or at birth. These factors must be taken in consideration when caring for this vulnerable patient population during a pandemic, such as COVID-19. Patients with a rare disease have to take their regular medication continuously to control their condition and frequently, the medications, directly or indirectly, affect their immune system. It is important for this patient population, if infected with COVID-19 or another severe form of infection, to adjust the treatment protocol by specialists, in consultation with their own medical team. Special awareness and educational programs, understandable for mentally retarded patients, must be developed to educate them about social distancing, curfew, sanitization, and sensitization to the disease and quarantine. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance to reconsider the care required by patients with a rare disease during a pandemic or disaster, a program that should be adopted by the World Health Organization and governmental institutions for consideration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/etiology , Rare Diseases/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Vaccines/pharmacology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , Humans , Patient Care/psychology , Rare Diseases/etiology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
7.
Hastings Cent Rep ; 51(2): 16-21, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1173809

ABSTRACT

Harrowing stories reported in the media describe Covid-19 ravaging through families. This essay reports professional experiences of this phenomenon, family clustering, as encountered during the pandemic's spread across Southern California. We identify three ethical challenges following from it: Family clustering impedes shared decision-making by reducing available surrogate decision-makers for incapacitated patients, increases the emotional burdens of surrogate decision-makers, and exacerbates health disparities for and the suffering of people of color at increased likelihood of experiencing family clustering. We propose that, in response to these challenges, efforts in advance care planning be expanded, emotional support offered to surrogates and family members be increased, more robust state guidance be issued on ethical decision-making for unrepresented patients, ethics consultation be increased in the setting of conflict following from family clustering dynamics, and health care professionals pay more attention to systemic and personal racial biases and inequities that affect patient care and the surrogate experience.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , COVID-19/epidemiology , Family Health , Family/psychology , Minority Health , Patient Care , Advance Care Planning/ethics , Advance Care Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , California/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Decision Making, Shared , Family Health/ethics , Family Health/ethnology , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Minority Health/ethics , Minority Health/ethnology , Patient Care/ethics , Patient Care/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Support , Third-Party Consent/ethics
9.
Brain Behav ; 11(3): e02007, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-976964

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We designed a follow-up study of frontline health workers at COVID-19 patient care, within the same working conditions, to assess the influence of their general characteristics and pre-existing anxiety/depression/dissociative symptoms and resilience on the development of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while monitoring their quality of sleep, depersonalization/derealization symptoms, acute stress, state anxiety, and burnout. METHODS: In a Hospital reconfigured to address the surge of patients with COVID-19, 204 frontline health workers accepted to participate. They completed validated questionnaires to assess mental health: before, during, and after the peak of inpatient admissions. After each evaluation, a psychiatrist reviewed the questionnaires, using the accepted criteria for each instrument. Correlations were assessed using multivariable and multivariate analyses, with a significance level of .05. RESULTS: Compared to men, women reporting pre-existing anxiety were more prone to acute stress; and younger age was related to both pre-existent common psychological symptoms and less resilience. Overall the evaluations, sleep quality was bad on the majority of participants, with an increase during the epidemic crisis, while persistent burnout had influence on state anxiety, acute stress, and symptoms of depersonalization/derealization. PTSD symptoms were related to pre-existent anxiety/depression and dissociative symptoms, as well as to acute stress and acute anxiety, and negatively related to resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existent anxiety/depression, dissociative symptoms, and coexisting acute anxiety and acute stress contribute to PTSD symptoms. During an infectious outbreak, psychological screening could provide valuable information to prevent or mitigate against adverse psychological reactions by frontline healthcare workers caring for patients.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Depersonalization/epidemiology , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Care/psychology , Patient Care/statistics & numerical data , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL